5 Comments
User's avatar
Ruth Sponsler's avatar

Thank you for citing Mohan Doss's piece in the _Journal of Nuclear Medicine_!!

Expand full comment
SmithFS's avatar

Yes, NRC's zero radiation tolerance policy. But according to them and their overlords (i.e. the Rockefeller gangsters) it's perfectly OK to blow up nuclear reactors and nuclear processing facilities including ones containing highly enriched uranium, which can go supercritical easily, causing a major radiation hazard. As long as it's to achieve regime change or other psychotic political goals, not to provide cheap, clean energy to the people, even a tiny radiation leakage is intolerable.

But Climate Change is an "existential threat" and "global boiling" is going to "end the world". Wouldn't want zero GHG emissions nuclear power to be economical again by having rational radiation policies, no sir Bob, someday, someone, somewhere, possibly, maybe might get an injury from radiation exposure.

Expand full comment
Ronald Underhill's avatar

Zero radiation, zero carbon, zero calories, zero emissions…but hundreds of vaccines?

I’m sure the science supports all of this.

Expand full comment
Ruth Sponsler's avatar

What do vaccines have to do with the topic of this essay??? Way off-topic.

If I were your teacher, I would turn your paper right back to you with a big fat goose egg.

Expand full comment
Ronald Underhill's avatar

Ruth, thank you for your kind comments. I hope you have a great 4th of July weekend and wish you the best in life!

Expand full comment